By Randall L. Broad
Read: Genesis 3:1-4:26;
Matthew 2:13-3:6; Psalm 2:1-12; Proverbs 1:7-9
One of the most well-known
narratives in the Bible is the fall of Adam and Eve found in Genesis chapter
three.
Deceived by the serpent,
they ate from the one tree they were commanded by God not to touch and sin
entered the world. This is a common topic in Sunday school classes and teaching
ministries used to explain the so called “problem of evil”. The question that
if God is all powerful and all knowing; why is there evil in the world. The
common explanation is that it is because of Adam and Eve’s fall and that every
human being born since has the same flawed character. Understanding this
question is crucial to living a Christ-centered life because it is through the
cross that we are restored to the same union God had with Adam and Eve.
Therefore the fall and the cross are essentially a singular event in the Will
and Purpose of God.
Prior to their disobedience
Adam and Eve both lived in fellowship with God. Both were created in the
likeness of God and had no knowledge of good and evil. That changes in Genesis
chapter 3.
1Now the serpent was
craftier than any of the wild animals the Lord God had made. He said to the
woman, “Did God really say, ‘You must not eat from any tree in the garden’?”
2The woman said to the
serpent, “We may eat fruit from the trees in the garden, 3but God
did say, ‘You must not eat fruit from the tree that is in the middle of the
garden, and you must not touch it, or you will die.’ ”
4“You will not certainly
die,” the serpent said to the woman. 5“For God knows that when you
eat from it your eyes will be opened, and you will be like God, knowing good
and evil.”
6When the woman saw that the
fruit of the tree was good for food and pleasing to the eye, and also desirable
for gaining wisdom; she took some and ate it. She also gave some to her
husband, who was with her, and he ate it. 7Then the eyes of both of
them were opened and they realized they were naked; so they sewed fig leaves together
and made coverings for themselves.
Genesis 3:1-7
But, what was their relationship
with God? What exactly was destroyed in that moment of free will? The answer is
found in the first two chapters of Genesis–it was recognition of the creator
and His creation. It was Adam and Eve living in union with their origin,
drawing their understanding of themselves and their purpose from their creator.
When they succumbed to the lies of the serpent they destroyed that union; they
began to question their relationship with God. A relationship that could only
be restored by a blood stained cross … And sadly, they discovered the knowledge
of “good and evil” did not make them “like God” (v. 5) as the serpent promised.
Instead Adam and Eve only received doubts and questions about themselves and God
that led them into a distorted view of the world around them. Notice how in the
moment “the eyes of both of them were opened” they became aware that they were
naked–they became aware of their own flesh and they became ashamed.
The theologian Dietrich
Bonhoeffer wrote:
“In the
knowledge of good and evil man does not understand himself in the reality of
the destiny appointed in his origin, but rather in his own possibilities, his
possibility of being good or evil.”[1]
What
changed that day in the garden for Adam and Eve was not their character, but
their revelation of themselves and God which their children would inherit. Adam
and Eve did not pass down a defective gene to the next generation, nor a
hereditary character flaw, but rather a flawed understanding of their flesh,
other men, and God … and then they were delivered over to death.
Meditating
on this blog I came to this conclusion about the post-modern world:
In the beginning:· Adam and Eve lived in union with God· In perfect awareness of their creator and their divine origin· They had no knowledge of good or evilThen the Serpent came:· He promised Eve they would know “good and evil”· He promised they could be like God· He asked the million dollar question, “Did God really say…?”Then Adam and Eve ate of the fruit:· Mankind had knowledge of good and evil· Satan became known to them· And humanity became good and evilSince that time:· Good and evil have battled for the souls of humanity· The battle has been fought individually and institutionallyAnd now in the post-modern world:· People no longer remember their creator· Mankind has forgotten his divine origin· And humanity no longer knows good from evil
Adam
and Eve were given the knowledge of good and evil and centuries later the
post-modern world doesn’t know good from evil. Post-modern man lives in
a world of pleasure and profit that twists values and knowledge to conform to
man’s own justification, his own deification. The worldview Adam and Eve
discovered in the garden lives in a state of constant disunion capable of
seeing only the distorted image of man as master of his own potential and
possibilities rather than the true form of man which can be found in the garden
before the fall and in the cross. There is hope for those who have a biblical
worldview which can be strengthened by the One Year Bible. The Gospels present
Jesus Christ as the true form of man who has replaced the flawed image Adam
became in succumbing to the lies of the serpent. In today’s reading we learn of
the fall, but in the days and months ahead everything we read in the One Year
Bible will reveal God’s plan for the coming of the Messiah who will restore the
union lost in the garden.
Walk with the Lord …
Ephesians 1:17
(RLB250102)
© Copyright 2017: Randall L. Broad
Disclaimer: This commentary is written by Randall L. Broad. It is in no way affiliated with or represents any denomination, university, church, or pastor. Any errors or omissions are purely my responsibility.
[1] Bonhoeffer,
Dietrich. Ethics. New York: Touchstone, 1955: 21-22.
[2]
The
modern positive interpretation of diversity
is not my intended meaning as it relates to gender and race which did not come
into usage until 1992. Throughout human history the word diversity was a negative one that meant to “turn away”, being
contrary to what is right; perversity; evil. See Harper,
Douglas. Online Etymology Dictionary: 2001-2016.
www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=diversity (accessed 2016).
No comments:
Post a Comment